Thursday, August 19, 2010
Trader Brian returns as the market falters; some thoughts on directions
So, let's see what Trader Brian's doing. Here we go:
=============
Wednesday, August 18, 8:59 pm
Hey - I've been super busy with the girls, but have gotten back to a little stock action and writing.
We still might have a weak break to SPY 1129ish, but I'll be shorting on the way up.
Long by weight:
SDS (added more),
POT (added another chunk),
CMG (added 1/4),
AUY (10.75 and 11.23 targets),
SXCI 73.38 stop,
MELI 66.37 stop,
X (a break over 50.35 I'll double down until the mid 50s,
APA,
SLT.
Hope trading is good!
Brian
Wednesday, March 3, 2010
Metals in decision-facing mode include steel - and yes, gold
I don't read the indicators as guaranteeing one way or the other. My rudimentary understanding of cycles is that there may be another low yet to come. If that happens, then the Elliott Wave count may be either a wave c of a second wave pullback that could make a new low to perhaps $980 in gold. Or more bearishly, that there could be a deeper and bigger wave C to retest $681 in gold. I'm tilting to the first of those two possibilities.
Also if it happens, many position investors will be delighted to buy another low, maybe especially if it's a new low. We want to do the same, especially with gold!
Tuesday, January 19, 2010
Sentiment and technicals are combining to drive equities higher into a turn window
Then there's the advance/decline - using that for Nasdaq (since $NYAD includes so much fixed-income securities trading). The A/D ticked up again but maybe we're seeing a bit of negative divergence in its own RSI, which can help point to a turn soon. And the TRIN - its MA's are all above 1.2, except for its 10-dma (still over 1.1) and its actual closing value was under 0.80. That's a start. I don't see how its MA's can get under 0.80 by Thursday - this may be an early clue that a correction won't be too deep yet (or that the turn might come after 1/21).
Well it remains valid for position and swing traders to be in the mode of selling into strength. Once the turn is in, the game will become selling rallies. A lot of things did well today (even RTH and especially DDS, and M, did well; also USX, healthcare, etc.). But once a turn happens, we can't guarantee it doesn't sweep along many sectors. So traders can trade around all this, and we'll all keep getting or being ready once the market rings its bell (1160-something, it seems?) and the turn we're expecting starts to manifest.
Monday, May 25, 2009
Notes for swing traders to consider for equities and gold (and iron/steel)
Sentiment - there certainly are various sentiment measures, but here's a data point at the ISEE charts and data: the ISE Equity-Only ratio finished Friday at 200. But the one at SentimenTrader looks a little more neutral as of the close Friday.
Historical note - according to a comment just now on Bloomberg TV, on this day (May 26, I suppose) in 1896, the Dow Industrials index was started, with an opening value of $40.94.
Gold investors and traders - I notice that there are two different paths that appear outlined for gold in the near-term. One, an upward path for this week in the ChartsEdge cycle forecast (posted earlier here, and available also at the Chartsedge site). The other, a path that would turn over and weaken but not seriously, in Chris Carolan's Solunar forecast for gold at his Carolan website. So, in addition to puzzling through the Elliott Wave count for gold at this juncture, it will be interesting to see which of these two gold "agrees with" during the week ahead. Depending on which wins out, we may see some type of triangular or diagonal movement set in as gold "decides" whether - or not - it wants to achieve my 1192 possible objective before reaching lower levels.
Finally, there's discussion again about the iron/steel markets. There's an idea that iron/steel may become one of the next bubbles. If that's to be the case, there may be plenty of time to get "with" that trend - if this is right, I'll have to find a better way to chart it than steel company stock prices.
But it reminds me of a similar suggestion about the defense/weapons sector, and I remember looking at the chart of Lockheed Martin (LMT) recently. There certainly are other companies in this sector that may be worth tracking too. At any rate, LMT looked in a consolidation, so if it breaks out to the upside from that, it may be worth going along (with appropriate stop-loss protection of course). Not advice, just something that investors might wish to assess.
Sunday, February 15, 2009
Nucor and US Steel may still offer investors value in the steel sector
The Nucor long-term monthly chart gives the impression that it may yet move to new all-time highs in an Elliott Wave fifth wave up. Alternatively, if you don't want to assume that and would like a more conservative target, the daily chart does show that Nucor could get to $61 or so, based on the relatively conservative idea that price already put in an A wave, corrected in a B wave, and then C up remains (so C=A at about 61). There are certainly wave counts that would take it higher than that. Note also that Nucor is moving in on its 200-day moving average. If Nucor gets above its 200-day moving average, it will be deemed "above the line" from a trading chart perspective and assumed to be uptrending on that basis alone (at least if the 200-day MA itself moves into an uptrending attitude, which does look possible to happen relatively soon. So, although I don't want to issue any guarantees, an investor might be interested in Nucor, back-stopped by my hypothetical uptrending channel line and the price level of $36.95. If it cannot hold $36.95, then it would be reasonable to sell out and re-assess (in order to protect investment capital).
So here are the Nucor charts, and then we'll look at the US Steel charts:


The US Steel (X) chart is more concerning, because of the depth of the drop and the indicators as mentioned, such as OBV, moved to a weaker position. Yet there do remain Elliott Wave counts in which it could have either a substantial rally, or - less likely but still possible - even get to new highs. Before we get all excited about which of these scenarios it might provide, let's approach it similarly to the Nucor chart - a long position back-stopped at just under $27.49, and in this case let's see if it can even do a C=A type movement up to ~$50. Let alone, whether X could get to its 200-day moving average which is currently about 93 ... but by the time X might get to $50, then its 200-day MA might be closer by:


Friday, January 30, 2009
US Steel looking poor today - investor alert

If X did a big triangle similar to the $TRAN we looked at yesterday, and is in some stage of a fifth wave thrust down out of it, then going under $28.36 will be part of that move and I'll stop out of my long position.
Then re-evaluate. Anyone trading on US Steel please note.
Thursday, January 29, 2009
Is a bearish TRIN signal coming home to roost?
Therefore, I agree it's too early to make any great pronouncements. But so far I'm not seeing anything that surprises me. (And you know how I'm viewing each of these if you've been reading here, and/or you can check with the labels to the right both here and at my trading-chart UBTNB3 site.)
By the way, from a fundamental perspective, very good analysis in comments by Niall Ferguson this morning in Alexis Glick's (Fox Business News) interview. Check it out if you have the opportunity.
One of the things we discussed here recently was a way to use the TRIN with its 3-day moving average, and it was flashing a bearish signal that usually kicks in a couple of days later. Today's weakness in equities may be the effects showing up now. Whether it turns into something more, is something I'm evaluating with the Elliott Wave count hypothesis I also reviewed here yesterday, and mentioned with the charts this morning - the possibility that more turbulence lies ahead ... As always, be careful out there, and happy trading all!

Tuesday, January 27, 2009
Hard to love oil; gold on the line; and a good enough day for US Steel (X)
Gold perched yesterday on one of the significant Fibonacci retrace levels I discussed yesterday. Moving under it today didn't look great, even though on light volume (better RSI would have helped). This may be a line in the sand ... moving above it again will be a real positive, or otherwise it may be a line to "trade away from":
As for oil, well, who can love this as a trade?! (This is what lack of "followthrough" looks like!) The indicators don't seem to be telling any better story than the price is telling. Sure, that can change - if and when it wants to.
ChartsEdge map for 1/27; and comments on US Steel

Posted: January 27th, 2009
Author: Mike Korell Filed under: One-Day Market Map »
Obviously, IF this is going to be the next "bubble," then it will have plenty of room to move! So let's see - and as always, be careful out there, and happy trading!
Saturday, January 24, 2009
Gauging technical potential for steel in the industrial sector
Perhaps this would also help the Dow Jones Industrial Average as a whole, or at least help it to perform relatively well compared to broader indices grappling relatively more with the financials and industries still succumbing to the credit market fallout. Steel may also pick up more quickly than other industrial metals, because the ability to stockpile inventories is rather less and therefore any pickup in demand relative to supply should perk up its price more swiftly. I've included "steel" in the news feeds topics (lower right side of the page) - so click that anytime, to help track developments in the steel market.
Without trying to weigh in too strongly on the fundamentals, I'm keeping an eye on US Steel (X) as a way to gauge this. I've stepped in a bit ... but will stop out if we lose critical near-term support ... and will step in more heavily if price and the indicators show improvement. Here are some thoughts I've marked on the charts. The comments about potential targets are quite preliminary. If price gets to targeted higher levels, then I may use that to TMAR (take money and run) on some of a position while playing the rest according to how the Elliott Wave pattern and indicators are showing.




It can be interesting to "cross reference" to the commitment of traders (COT) chart for copper - also a building material, though perhaps subject to more speculation - where the commercial positions as of Tuesday (Jan. 20) actually showed their net long position continuing to increase:

Monday, January 12, 2009
A note about swing trade chart updates
Maybe we can also use that site for discussions about how to read and use those indicators for managing swing trades - buy, hold, sell points.
I'll still be posting about them here, but generally in terms of pointing out when something particular significant seems to be going on with any of them.
Good luck all and happy trading!
Saturday, December 27, 2008
Agricultural commodities into 2009; oil; and steel

Tony Caldaro includes agricultural commodities among his many charts (you can find under the "other sites of interest" to the right). I don't personally have an Elliott Wave count for this market, but I sure enjoy looking at the RSI bullish divergence showing on his long term (weekly bars) chart, below.
I gather that Tony's count implies a rally, rather than not going to new highs ... well, even a rally can be very playable as a long swing trade, with the idea that it lasts for some months into 2009!

May as well take another look at oil today, too. First, a look at the monthly long-term chart:

And, here's a closeup daily-bars chart, from Tony Caldaro's site - RSI has upturned again so we'll see if it "holds" this time and can move into rally mode:


Tuesday, December 23, 2008
Quick look at some things we're following

Bonds ... my big question in the $UST being, is landing 5 cents away from the Fibonacci level, enough to have put in a cycle top? The RSI negative divergence is quite slight - could be enough if the last wave up is counted as a "C", but would expect more negative divergence on a fifth wave (including the fifth wave within a "C") ... will have to look at price and volume action from here to discern the answer:
Thursday, December 18, 2008
Specific markets - oil, steel
But I'm not giving up on a decent Fibonacci retracement bounce in oil ... just wondering at this point, given how watched and anemic it is, whether the bounce will provide really good returns on a long trade....
If looking for an entry in X, as a swing trade, then be sure to wait until a pullback is followed by a trigger day up (that goes above, and preferably closes above, the high of the pullback low day).
Wednesday, December 17, 2008
DAG and X

As for steel - whew, doubling off the bottom is a nice way to bounce, don't know if this will afford a pullback entry or if it already did (kinda looks that way ...) and it's just a matter of trying a buy entry with tight stop (just in case there is a deep pullback):